<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on Rails Performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sniping.org/2007/03/06/thoughts-on-rails-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sniping.org/2007/03/06/thoughts-on-rails-performance/</link>
	<description>snipe -- verb [intrans.] -- make a sly or petty verbal attack</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:59:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: drjones</title>
		<link>http://sniping.org/2007/03/06/thoughts-on-rails-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1721</link>
		<dc:creator>drjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sniping.org/2007/03/06/thoughts-on-rails-performance/#comment-1721</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thats good to hear... starting to get more into the guts of Django, and am liking it alot. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I too, really love Ruby (what little I know of it) but im starting to warm up to python.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats good to hear&#8230; starting to get more into the guts of Django, and am liking it alot. </p>
<p>I too, really love Ruby (what little I know of it) but im starting to warm up to python.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fdiv_bug</title>
		<link>http://sniping.org/2007/03/06/thoughts-on-rails-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1220</link>
		<dc:creator>fdiv_bug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sniping.org/2007/03/06/thoughts-on-rails-performance/#comment-1220</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve run the tests with Django and I&#039;ll be adding the results to the tables above shortly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Deploying Django appears to be &lt;strong&gt;nuts&lt;/strong&gt; easier than Rails.  You just need mod_python, and a few mod_python directives to make sure it can add the right directory to sys.path, and you&#039;re good to go.  Admittedly, my experience with deploying Django is far, far more limited than it is with Rails, but knowing how easy it is to manage mod_&lt;em&gt;anything&lt;/em&gt; in a production Apache environment I&#039;m reasonably confident that Django is as easy as it looks in this regard.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now if only I liked Python as much as I like Ruby...  :-\&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve run the tests with Django and I&#8217;ll be adding the results to the tables above shortly.</p>
<p>Deploying Django appears to be <strong>nuts</strong> easier than Rails.  You just need mod_python, and a few mod_python directives to make sure it can add the right directory to sys.path, and you&#8217;re good to go.  Admittedly, my experience with deploying Django is far, far more limited than it is with Rails, but knowing how easy it is to manage mod_<em>anything</em> in a production Apache environment I&#8217;m reasonably confident that Django is as easy as it looks in this regard.</p>
<p>Now if only I liked Python as much as I like Ruby&#8230;  :-\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drjones</title>
		<link>http://sniping.org/2007/03/06/thoughts-on-rails-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1219</link>
		<dc:creator>drjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sniping.org/2007/03/06/thoughts-on-rails-performance/#comment-1219</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nah, hadnt seen that.. and wow, did all the PHP users get really really mad, if you read the comments.   I&#039;ll never understand those who make a web framework/programming language, a core part of their identity..&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yea, rails does have its complications in a hosting environment.  I&#039;m not sure if Django suffers the same issues, but I imagine its a bit easier givin the maturity of apache/python integration.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, hadnt seen that.. and wow, did all the PHP users get really really mad, if you read the comments.   I&#8217;ll never understand those who make a web framework/programming language, a core part of their identity..</p>
<p>Yea, rails does have its complications in a hosting environment.  I&#8217;m not sure if Django suffers the same issues, but I imagine its a bit easier givin the maturity of apache/python integration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fdiv_bug</title>
		<link>http://sniping.org/2007/03/06/thoughts-on-rails-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1132</link>
		<dc:creator>fdiv_bug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sniping.org/2007/03/06/thoughts-on-rails-performance/#comment-1132</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Heya, Will!  Long time no chat.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I like your idea of testing Django, Symfony, and CakePHP -- I hadn&#039;t even heard of the latter two -- and I&#039;ll do that when I have some time in the near future.  Have you seen http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/Framework+Performance yet?  Someone&#039;s run their own testing and it looks like Django is the fastest, and I&#039;d wager that has a lot to do with Python being a great language for this sort of thing, combined with mod_python&#039;s maturity and speed.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Deploying Rails apps to a normal web hosting environment -- which is to say, one designed for the hosting of static content and PHP pages through mod_php, and not one designed from the ground up for Rails -- is still a borderline nightmare.  Having good mod_ruby support and performance would probably go a long way, but Rails has fallen into the &quot;just proxy it over HTTP&quot; line of reasoning that Zope and Tomcat got into long ago.  Not that there&#039;s necessarily anything wrong with it, but it does change the way one can optimize and where performance gains can be found.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heya, Will!  Long time no chat.</p>
<p>I like your idea of testing Django, Symfony, and CakePHP &#8212; I hadn&#8217;t even heard of the latter two &#8212; and I&#8217;ll do that when I have some time in the near future.  Have you seen <a href="http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/Framework+Performance" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/Framework+Performance</a> yet?  Someone&#8217;s run their own testing and it looks like Django is the fastest, and I&#8217;d wager that has a lot to do with Python being a great language for this sort of thing, combined with mod_python&#8217;s maturity and speed.  </p>
<p>Deploying Rails apps to a normal web hosting environment &#8212; which is to say, one designed for the hosting of static content and PHP pages through mod_php, and not one designed from the ground up for Rails &#8212; is still a borderline nightmare.  Having good mod_ruby support and performance would probably go a long way, but Rails has fallen into the &#8220;just proxy it over HTTP&#8221; line of reasoning that Zope and Tomcat got into long ago.  Not that there&#8217;s necessarily anything wrong with it, but it does change the way one can optimize and where performance gains can be found.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drjones</title>
		<link>http://sniping.org/2007/03/06/thoughts-on-rails-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1037</link>
		<dc:creator>drjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sniping.org/2007/03/06/thoughts-on-rails-performance/#comment-1037</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Fdiv, &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your old roomate and ex-RH coworker here... &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d like to see comparisons vs some of the php rails-esque frameworks like symfony or cake, and see how the results vary ;)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, throw some Django in the mix...  I am leaning towards that now rather than Rails for some web projects I&#039;m working on.   Admittedly my understanding of both frameworks is very shallow, but I like the loosely coupled approach of Django, much better.  Plugins in rails so far seem to me to look like a huge workaround to the tight coupling of components that Rails uses.  Just seems to make it a lot of extra work for you to write reusable bits.   The Rails love affair with Mysql is a big turn off as well:P   I do miss migrations though..  Either way, my opinions may change as I learn more about both frameworks... why oh why did I start playing WoW?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyways.. I wouldnt count rails out, until you run benchmarks against some of the php frameworks.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-Will&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Fdiv, </p>
<p>Your old roomate and ex-RH coworker here&#8230; </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see comparisons vs some of the php rails-esque frameworks like symfony or cake, and see how the results vary <img src='http://sniping.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Also, throw some Django in the mix&#8230;  I am leaning towards that now rather than Rails for some web projects I&#8217;m working on.   Admittedly my understanding of both frameworks is very shallow, but I like the loosely coupled approach of Django, much better.  Plugins in rails so far seem to me to look like a huge workaround to the tight coupling of components that Rails uses.  Just seems to make it a lot of extra work for you to write reusable bits.   The Rails love affair with Mysql is a big turn off as well:P   I do miss migrations though..  Either way, my opinions may change as I learn more about both frameworks&#8230; why oh why did I start playing WoW?</p>
<p>Anyways.. I wouldnt count rails out, until you run benchmarks against some of the php frameworks.</p>
<p>-Will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

